This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
A Google spokesperson told the BBC: "We're deeply sorry for this mistake. We've removed the offensive notification and are working to prevent this from happening again."
，详情可参考搜狗输入法2026
特朗普形容相關行動為正在進行中的「重大作戰行動」，並呼籲伊朗民眾在行動完成後推翻由宗教人士主導的統治。
FT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition